level=roof sounds fine to me. Roof always gets special treatment (it’s usually never a floor number)
> On Nov 12, 2014, at 6:34 PM, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:22 PM, johnw <jo...@mac.com> wrote: >> 2014-11-11 12:53 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de>: > >>> Therefore, would prefer a generic tag that can be added to any feature, >>> e.g. location=rooftop. > > -1 > 'location' is already a bad keyword in OSM. Like "type", it is too > generic and could be used for every thing. > >> On Nov 11, 2014, at 9:36 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> >> Those are excellent ideas. Then you could use location=rooftop (or similar) >> to place basically anything on the roof, including multistory or surface >> parking structures. Garden roofs come to mind. > > I think the roof is part of the building 3d or levels mapping. We > should not create a new use of "location" just for that. I could also > imagine that in some buildings, the parking is somewhere in the middle > and not necessarily on the top or on the bottom of the building, in > which case you will have to invent a new tag for that. > I would prefer something like "level=roof" or "level=3". Just where > the parking(s) is in the building. > > Pieren > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
