Please, try mapping bays as areas - not as nodes. It is really rare to see it done this way - but it is doable, see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/5CQ
Bay mapped as node is hard to process - for example: deciding whatever name should be rendered. It is completely impossible to retrieve information whatever name applies to some small area or larger one. Obviously label for tiny bay should not displayed at the same time with the same style as label for bay thousands times larger. But getting information about area from natural=bay mapped as node in most cases it is impossible task even for human - see http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2681179665#map=11/53.7700/14.7670 for an example. taginfo lists 783 ways vs 34 585 nodes. Situation is even worse, as some bays are marked as unclosed ways what is not much better than node (human may now reconstruct area, but this task is still nearly impossible for computer). Overpass turbo link with query for natural=bay nodes: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/5CW (note: please, no changes based on guesswork. You may move map and select run to retrieve data for your area).
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
