It is perfectly fine to revert somebody. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle
2014-10-08 12:48 GMT+02:00 Pee Wee <piewi...@gmail.com>: > If I understand correctly you say it would be better if the wiki stated > that the compulsory cycleway is drawn as a separte way. I think you are > right. I could changed that in the wiki. Unfortunately the user Ulamm has > changed the wiki (for the worse in my opinion) so I'll send him an email > before I make any changes. > > Cheers > > PeeWee32 > > 2014-10-08 12:34 GMT+02:00 Hubert <sg.fo...@gmx.de>: > >> Thanks for the help and the links. That was my opinion, too. >> >> I asked, because the use is not clear by just reading the definition and >> not looking at the examples. >> >> highway=road + cycleway=track + bicycle=use_sidepath together, without an >> additional highway=cycleway OSMWay (for example) seem correct by definition. >> >> I can understand the confusion. Should the use be made more prominent in >> the description of the value? >> >> >> >> Yours >> >> Hubert >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> > > > -- > Verbeter de wereld. Word mapper voor Openstreetmap > <http://www.openstreetmap.org>. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
