On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfei...@computer.org> wrote:
> Thus the comparison with [amenity=school], that can be easily expanded to > the > whole campus, fails for [amenity=place_of_worship]. > > Thus, an active church building should be tagged > [amenity=place_of_worship] > [building=church] > [religion=*] > and surrounded by > [landuse=religious] > [religion=*] I'm not following you here. Active or not doesn't change the fact that now we have two different ways for tagging an amenity and its surrounding area when we compare with "school", "hospital", "university" or wahteveramenityyoulike. We don't need a "landuse=school" because the amenity=school is already covering the area, not the individual buildings. We have to follow the same logic for all features. The problem is that amenity=place_of_worship rendering is for a building on the main map style. This could be fixed by using a differente style/colour/transparency if the tag "amenity=place_of_worship" is combined or not with a tag "building=*". It's extremely sad and dangerous to create a precedent now just because we have a rendering issue for one of the "amenity" keys. Pieren _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
