2014-08-20 15:54 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
> > > Il giorno 20/ago/2014, alle ore 14:56, Mateusz Konieczny < > matkoni...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > The problem with "legally dedicated" is that it might mean "are legally >> allowed to use" or "are legally required to use rather than an >> alternative". I've always understand "designated" to suggest the second of >> these and "yes" the first. >> >> > For me it is also the second one. But I prefer to start changes from > something more general. > > > > It will mean "legally allowed" in all cases and the second interpretation > only in some (I guess fewer) cases (e.g. some cycleways in Germany under > certain conditions). > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > Anyway, there is use_sidepath for mapping this difference.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
