On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:54:11AM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > 2014-08-11 18:28 GMT+02:00 Christopher Hoess <cahoess@gmail.c > <caho...@gmail.com> > > > > As the author of the last big redesign, I'm having trouble understanding > > some of these criticisms and would appreciate it if people would draw out > > the critique a bit so I can try to improve things. > > > > > > > Some people consider freeform values in bridge tag as a problem and think > that bridge tag should have only yes/no values and specific > type of bridge should be stored in a separate tag. It is notable as these > people maintain Default Style - see > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/440
the result of the mentioned redesign is exactly that - there should be much fewer freeform values now. Other subtypes of bridges (humpback, suspension, drawbridge, swing etc) have been moved to subtags bridge:structure and bridge:movable. It would be important that those few bridge values that remained after the redesign are rendered. Also rendering the outline of man_made=bridge would be a huge progress. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
