On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> wrote:
> > > > The image reminds me of a bridge, no longer open for traffic, on the old > National Pike in Western Maryland. I can see where one might want to reduce > speed on one of those to avoid bottoming out or becoming airborne. > > I think rather that bridge:structure=humpback I'd prefer > bridge:geometry=humpback. At least something that conveys shape meaning. > For me structure implies the design element that gives a building, bridge, > dam, etc. its strength. In the case of the photo that would be masonry arch > for structure. > > +1. "Humpback" seems mostly to be defined by the aesthetic effect and the potential effect on vehicles; there seems to be a popular "Humpback Bridge" on Virginia that's a covered truss with a mild humpback. I'd rather not dilute the more or less coherent nature of "bridge:structure=", although better that than "bridge=". Although tagging it as some sort of highway hazard or condition is not a bad idea either. -- Chris
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
