On 07.08.2014 12:05, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > If I understand Karsten correctly, the limitation is not about payment, > it is to limit the number of people using this path. This would be > typical for climbing crags in > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conservation > areas. > > A typical example is the sandstone climbing in Saxonia/Germany, which > is in > a national park that even has a core zone. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1595534 > > The agreement between the protectionists and the climbing associations > is that only people "destined" to climb should leave the hiking paths > marked for the general public and use those narrow access paths. > > Thus it would be possible to tag > access=destination > which could then be specified with > destination=climbing
Tom - yes you understood me right :) There is no one who check whether your a climber or not or want to have a fee - but these path are not aimed to be used by the general public. I admit that access=customers doesn't fit here so summed up we have these approaches: access=destination destination=climbing or access=climbers or access=no climbing=yes I'm ok with each of them but which one should be documented in the wiki Karsten _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
