For reference, it is documented here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Piste_Maps#aerialway
Maybe the aerialway tag page should reflect the pistemaps page.
On 22 juillet 2014 09:33:48 UTC+02:00, Yves <yve...@gmail.com> wrote:
>mixed_lift is an old and established value.
>
>On 22 juillet 2014 09:15:44 UTC+02:00, Holger Jeromin
><mailgm...@katur.de> wrote:
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I found the rare but (in winter sport areas) important mixed_lifts
>with
>>chairs and gondolas are not rendered on the osm mainpage.
>>
>>An issue for the rendering style
>>https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/347
>>suggested a discussion about this tag here on the tagging list.
>>
>>I see no alternative to add this additional value in aerialway due to
>>its difference to a chair_lift or a gondola. But a relation would add
>>unneeded complexity to the feature.
>>
>>Additional tagging to further define the lift future proof could be
>>aerialway=mixed_lift
>>mixed_lift:chair=yes
>>mixed_lift:gondola=yes
>>
>>I found a small note about this tag at:
>>http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.tagging/16695/
>>
>>> What if there is a mixed lift with chairs that have 4 seats and
>>chairs that have 2 seats?
>>
>>This could be solved by a prefix
>>mixed_lift:chair:occupancy=2
>>mixed_lift:gondola:occupancy=4
>>mixed_lift:occupancy=3 //for backward compatibility if wanted
>>
>>What do you think?
>>
>>--
>>best regards
>>Holger
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Tagging mailing list
>>Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>--
>Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
