2014-07-20 15:29 GMT+02:00 John Willis <jo...@mac.com>: > So what about the rest - the landuse for the area - is my basic > understanding remiss? Am I misinterpreting a basic tenent of OSM with my > statement on area defined by landuse and buildings and amenities over it? > > Even if you disagree on landuse=religion, is that how the others work? > > Thanks for pointing out that about railway tag, but I'm interested in your > comments the bigger question. >
I am not sure if I completely understand your question. I think the "rest" (or whole area) can evventually be split over different landuses, that is not a problem itself. "landuse" is not suited (IMHO) to create a feature on its own (besides that of the use of land). If there are other things you'd like to tag you should use specific tags for them (or introduce new tags where missing). For "religion" there is the key "religion", I do not understand what information would be added with landuse=religious that isn't already specified with "religion" the key and "denomination" its subkey and other related keys, but I see potential conflicts with other established landuse values like residential, forest, etc. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
