On 2014-07-06 08:40, Jo wrote :
> off list:
>
> André, I'm in the process of ending the addition of 37000 stops of De
> Lijn to OSM. None of them have the holy source tags and still I'm able
> to compute which ones still need to be done.
>
> So I'm not worried about getting bitten in the back.
>
> I have a system in place which works and which doesn't rely on source
> tags.
>
> It only relies on ref tags (and operator for the Overpass query)
I already replied to that too, Jo.
How many versions of De Lijn have you applied?
If you rely on the existence of the ref= tag in an OSM bus stop to tell
that the 2014-04 version of the import has been applied to it, then you
will have a problem to tell the same way if a 2015-xx version is applied.
source=TEC 2014-04 is required unless you are prepared to change your
algorithm with every new update.
> I know that you know how to bulk add source tags, the explanation was
> only there for when you were going to insisit on adding them yourself.
> You can, if you want, but I'm not going to. Just like I stopped doing
> so for the ones of De Lijn. That's right/, /I started by adding them
> just like anybody else would.
>
> Then I started reading the imports list and came to the conclusion
> they clutter the DB AND it's not clear afterwards which tag they refer
> to anyway, or whether they refer to the position.
The DB space is insignificant and you may choose to call them
source:TEC_data or whatever you like.
> So I tend to understand your concern, but I don't happen to share it
> and this is based on practical experience built up over the past
> years, doing exactly what we want to do with the TEC data: importing
> stops and creating route relations based on them.
Once.

André.



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to