2014-06-23 16:22 GMT+02:00 Brad Neuhauser <brad.neuhau...@gmail.com>:

> I would agree with Martin and disagree with John there. I guess I have a
> broader definition of fire pit/ring as something that exists mainly to
> contain a fire on the ground, and which may or may not be used for cooking.



what about "fire_site", would that be a suitable neutral / structure
independent term which could avoid misinterpretation? Or is this too
generic and won't imply any kind of dedicated structure (i.e. it would say
that there is a spot where a fire had been / could be lit, but it won't say
that the place is suitable to do so)? I somehow do agree with John that
literally a fire pit should be "dug into the ground".

cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to