|
On 2014-06-15 22:11, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote :
source:XXXX is supposed to generalize source:name.Am 15/giu/2014 um 02:40 schrieb David Bannon <dban...@internode.on.net>: Interestingly, its already contains the recommendation "source:name=survey 10 November 2012" - I was not aware of that !wouldn't it be more interesting in this example what the actual source for the name was (e.g. road sign, spoke to a local, etc.)? A simple "survey" doesn't tell this. In my text, survey helps to avoid making already done verifications, especially because a source publication date is not a verification date. survey can contain the date of dateless sources like visual or knowledge.survey is hence supposed to exist beside source information having publication date or not, "spoke to a local" being generally "knowledge" etc. Isn't it clear enough? should I elaborate? I was expanding a short text much already and I feared not being read. Please make text suggestions (do dos, don't don'ts). Thanks in advance,
|
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
