2014-06-04 18:03 GMT+01:00 bulwersator <bulwersa...@zoho.com>: > I guess that push toward tagging POI as nodes is result of fact that in some > situations only nodes are processed properly (at least that is why I tag new > features in this way).
I don't think it's a good idea to adapt your tagging practices to suit systems that can't be bothered to handle ways/relations! Please, if you think a feature is geographically better represented as a way, do it as a way. I prefer to map the physical extent of a shop when possible, since shops very often occupy a non-trivial physical area (especially large ones, e.g. supermarkets). So to answer the original question: no those wiki edits would seem to be misguided, and for more reasons than just one-feature-one-element. Just my 2p of course Best wishes Dan > ---- On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 09:43:25 -0700 Andrew Hain > <andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote ---- > > Over the past few days there have been a number of wiki edits (mainly but > not entirely in German) stating that shop=* and similar tags, contrary to > the “One feature, one OSM element” principle [1], should only ever be put > on nodes and not on building polygons. I’ve commented on an affected talk > page without any response. > > Is there any justification for these edits? > > [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
