noexit=yes on ways makes absolutely no sense and mentioning this tagging style 
on wiki suggests otherwise.

---- On Fri, 30 May 2014 17:16:29 -0700 André Pirard 
<a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> wrote ---- 


  On 2014-05-30 18:47, SomeoneElse wrote :
 
 5388b60f.9080...@mail.atownsend.org.uk" type="cite"> We had a long 
discussion in 
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-April/017247.html 
 and now I saw in the English wiki 
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit this: 
 
 "Use the noexit=yes tag on a way to indicate that the way is leading 
 to a dead end." 
 
 I really don't remember having a consensus about this (and thus this 
 info shouldn't be in the wiki). 
   Although many people including me were saying that noexit=yes is absolute 
nonsense on a way, Pieren was insisting very much to allow it that manner 
because people were tagging it that manner, but without saying what those 
people mean, if anything.
 And he modified the noexit=yes page; "without consensus" as you say.
 I am the person who, wisely I hope, split the page in two parts, "node" and 
"way" so that anything funny could be written under "way" without destroying 
the well agreed "node" part, which is sensible except that the term 
"noexit=yes" is a mistake bait: it should have been called something like 
"intentional=yes" (polite tournure for QA=shutup).
 As we didn't know "what those people mean", I put it the only polite guess I 
could think of beside "nonsense"; "indicate that the way is leading to a dead 
end" while saying loudly that the least that could be done is telling toward 
which direction it leads to a dead end.
 I was thanked and there was a single comment at the right time it was to make 
them: that "way" usage should be deprecated.
 My own opinion is that all those "noexit=yes" should be bulk erased (with an 
explanatory message to the author) and that those QAs should do their job fully 
by reporting "noexit=yes" on nodes where they have no (false) error to report 
in the first place.
 Pieren asked my reasons "for no way" privately, I replied (in French) and he 
did not reply further.
 
 BTW, the only sort of explanation for a non-intentional=yes  noexit=yes is 
indicating that it's not an unfinished highway.  To which I replied that it's 
wiser to tag the unfinished highways visibly than to embark upon tagging every 
other dead end invisibly.
 
 Consensus:  I am asking it to replace in the "node" part "This tag is mainly 
useful" with "This tag is only useful", as there is no other explained reason 
than QA deterrent and because that phrasing leads taggers to invent other 
reasons.
 Please state your opinion, of course.
 
 5388b60f.9080...@mail.atownsend.org.uk" type="cite">So edit the wiki to say 
that there's no concensus, and add a citation linking to the tagging list 
discussion? 
  As it is clearly understood, It's up to you and their dog to modify the "way" 
part of that page any manner you see fit, including the phrase you cite as long 
as it continues to contains the shunting word "way" (but hitting one's mates 
isn't allowed).
 Why nobody did it yet is a deep mystery.
 Notice that someone re-introduced, "because it has been forgotten" he said, 
the phrase "... at the end of a highway ..." to which I found necessary to add 
"... on the node at the end" and that is under "Usage" after all the very 
necessary warnings.
 5388b60f.9080...@mail.atownsend.org.uk" type="cite"> That would make the 
page more honest than it is at the moment. 
  Thank you for the word "honesty"!
 Contrarily to the other ones, my change has been duly announced.
 
 Please note that this is a summary of what has already been written and 
hopefully my last message about this.
 
 5388b60f.9080...@mail.atownsend.org.uk" type="cite">Cheers, 
 
 Andy 
 
 (who tends to use the wiki rather like a drunk uses a lamppost) 
  "Hello lamppost, what you knowing? I've come to watch your flowers growing 
..." ;-)  (Simon & Garfunkel)
 
 message_exit=yes as they tag it ;-)
 Cheers,
 
    André.  
   
 _______________________________________________ 
Tagging mailing list 
Tagging@openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging 



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to