Hi Martin, I was the one that marked the proposal for the key capital as cancelled (maybe abandoned was a better status). I did this because I saw it's use was a complete mess in tag info, and as far as I knew, admin_centre had the same purpose, so I just wanted to help to clean the wiki from it's countless inconsistencies and abandoned proposals.
If the use of the key capital is well established, please at least create a page Key:capital explaining it's use. Em 13/05/2014 10:35, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdre...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > > 2014-05-13 15:02 GMT+02:00 Ilya Zverev <zve...@textual.ru>: > >> >> First, this discussion it seemed was about removing admin_level tags, >> and not straightening up the tagging schema. I posted my reply because >> I had seen the tag removed from Berlin, not replaced by another. Left >> there is capital=yes tag, which is sometimes used along with >> admin_level=* ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:capital ). >> > > > I am aware of that page (one hour ago reset it from "cancelled" to "draft" > because capital as a key is not "cancelled" but well established). IMHO > this proposal (and its discussion) doesn't advocate setting admin_level > aside the capital tag. There was this idea back in 2008, but if you follow > the discussion it looks as if capital is the key to go with (so no need for > duplicating the same value in "admin_level" as well). > > Btw.: I completely agree with you that inheriting from administrative > relations is worse than having an explicit tag on the place, as this > inheritance idea doesn't work well with dynamic data (incremental updates > and how they are usually applied, osm2pgsql). > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
