I've added a note to the wiki to avoid future confusion: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aboundary%3Dadministrative&diff=1037547&oldid=1000731
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2014-05-11 3:50 GMT+02:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira <nao...@gmail.com>: > >> Isn't "admin_level" a property of "boundary=administrative?" (that is >> also a an specialization of a "boundary" relation) >> >> Using "admin_level" outside (or without) a "boundary=administrative" >> relation will be as wrong/incomplete as using "service" without a >> "highway=service", "railway" or "waterway"; or using "crossing_ref" >> without "crossing", for example. > > > > +1 > I'd also see it like this. Use the role admin_centre in administrative > relations to include the central place, and/or add a > capital=<admin_level-number> on the place object to store its administrative > importance conveniently (no need to evaluate administrative relations or to > inherit importance from a relation). > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Fernando Trebien +55 (51) 9962-5409 "Nullius in verba." _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
