'office=bike_sharing' makes the most sense to me. 'sharing:office=bike' is unintuitive and confusing, IMO.
Ryan Kaldari On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:52 AM, nounours77 <kuessemondtaegl...@gmail.com>wrote: > Dear Volker, > > Office=bike_sharing > also does not sem correct. > > > In the current tagging, this sounds rather straight-forward to me!! > > But there should be a better, generique way for this. We discussed part of > this on boat_sharing / boat_renting, or car_riding ... maybe you join in? > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generic_service_object_model > > So, I would think on something like > > for the parking place of rental bikes this would mean: *sharing=bike* > (instead of amenity=bike_sharing) > > and for the office of the bike_sharing: *sharing:office=bike* > > (to repeat: we would specifiy the "action-tags": sharing, renting, > selling, .... and the sub-tags: no sub-tag = physical location/pick-up > place ... sub-tag: office: location of the sharing agency etc.). > > What do you think? > > nounours77 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
