On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 02:06:13PM -0300, Fernando Trebien wrote: > "the validator will only prevent the most obvious errors but will give > you no clue how to fix them correctly" > > I know. But two or three rounds of trial and error with the validator > should be enough to bring a new user to an acceptable representation.
the validator has no idea how the crossing is supposed to look like, this is a very optimistic assumption optimistic for anything but the simplest cases. > "or one of covered,location,indoor,steps,lift or level, maybe more." > > I have to read more about them an check their usage, but they could > all be incorporated in the same rule in the validator. It's just a few > extra values in a set referred to in a rule. Surely this set can grow > over time. I have a bunch of search strings for JOSM on my user page, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:RicoZ use those as tests for the assumptions. In most part of the world what they match are obvious errors - with the exception of some parts of Chicago City which I do not know well enough to judge what is going on there. Reply to "level" related things in next email. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
