Did you every think about "00:00-24:00; Fr 14:00-22:00 off" I really do not get your problems as the syntax already allows a lot. Still do not have any need for "open/closed" or closing_hours.
One good point about the discussion is that "appointment" is considered valid. cu fly On 14.03.2014 12:37, André Pirard wrote: > On 2014-03-13 19:06, Pieren wrote : >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Robin `ypid` Schneider <ypi...@aol.de> >> wrote: >> >> It's unclear if your proposal is "opening_hours=SH(summer holiday)" or >> "opening_hours=SH" (then you should correct the wiki because the tag >> template is using the first version) >> >> I guess you plan to update the main "opening_hours" wiki if the >> proposal is accepted ? > As well as > > * choose one of the 5 or 6 contradictory forms, each denying the > former ones, that were answered to my case that I finally proposed > unambiguously as *closing-hours=Fr 14:00-22:00* (in a message > followed by -1 -1 -1 and 2 or 3 more contradictory tags) > * if the answer to the simplified diagram I added to try to clarify > many things is really "it's wrong", say what is wrong and correct it > * especially, regarding *your* particular proposition > *opening_hours="open; Fr 14:00-22:00 off"* > o explain: "open" and "closed" appear to be some new invention > [*of mine, *in the diagram] > o write a definition for *off* or validate/correct the definition > in my diagram and explain the following replies to this request > or its usage: > + it's not used; > + it's used but not like that; > + *off* must not be defined but grasped; > + the meaning of "off" is wrong > + "off" [must not be defined because it] has been in use for > quite some time already. > + http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Time_domains > explains quite well how the overall opening_hours syntax > works (why then did I have to add its URL to the main page?) > o write a definition or *open*, make up your mind between, and > clarify: > + "open" and "closed" appear to be some new invention > + It was introduced by Netzwolf some years ago because it is > needed as <rule_modifier> (when used together with a > comment). It is now used over 150 times to do exactly that > (regex: /open\s+"/). Of course it is an invention but one > which is required > + make explanations for the general tagger (I'm fine with > regexp but not everybody) > o clarify: "Because of the definition that following rules will > overwrite previous once, times which span over midnight have to > use additional rules which are separated by comma instead of > semicolon. " > + probably "override previous ones" and general syntax > + instead of a casual remark about an example, make it a > proper explanation > # of the difference between comma and semicolon > # of how rules override one another; "graspingly", ranges > specifying opening time would add themselves to opening > time and ranges specifying closing time would subtract > themselves from it, but I've seen an example for which > the range was said to both add and subtract. > > BTW, if the only reaction to *closing-hours=Fr 14:00-22:00* is -1 -1 -1 > vs all of the above (and more) for the *opening-hours= ?_0 |?_1 |?_2 > |?_3 |?_4 |?_5 *... attempted equivalents, then my *closing-hours > *proposition is obviously not a question of opinion or liking but an > absolute necessity. > > Hoping this will help, > Cheers, > > André. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
