What do you mean by 'factorize'? Jo
2014-03-13 15:00 GMT+01:00 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > How great to finally more than an empty > page<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet>!!! > But now, if that relation factorizes (2) "street name" shouldn't it > factorize addr: city, country, postcode too? > Shouldn't those keys be allowed in the relation? > Shouldn't those who know the deep secrets of that relation write that down > in this page instead of various messages I see? > > But I have a little problem here<http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176885423> > . > addr:housenumber is on a node. > If the relation contains > > - Way Le Théâtre à Denis > (176885423)<http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176885423>as house > - Node 1873693518 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1873693518> as > house > > JOSM diagnoses > "Member for role house of wrong type" - Role verification problem > 2 objects: Rue Sainte-Marguerite, Le Théâtre à Denis > > Now if I remove the second member (1), JOSM diagnoses *2 problems*: > House number without street > "Member for role house of wrong type" - Role verification problem > 2 objects: Rue Sainte-Marguerite, Le Théâtre à Denis > > (1) the role is "house" but the descriptive comment very vaguely, tersely > and strangely describes it as "one or more house numbers" which is logical. > Should I assume that "house" is a misnomer, that it means "address" and > that I need only the node? > > (2) After having received the message below, quoting the worst written > article of all the wiki, always invoked without justifications, saying > that "I have not understood" that relations are not made to factorize tags > of all members, I am surprised to see associatedStreet factorize the > "street" tag of all of its "house" members. > Who did not understand? > A relation, whatever its type but probably not associatedStreet, could as > well factorize a speed limit or any zone. > > Cheers, > > André. > On 2012-11-22 01:34, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote : > > Hi, > > Le mercredi 21 novembre 2012 22:53:53, A.Pirard.Papou a écrit : > > Look at multilinestring, which I see as a swiss-knife way assembly. > > In my mind, such a relation is the way to assign the same tags to a > collection of objects making a whole with regard to those tags. If we > add recursion (nesting), which is very easy to do, that's powerful. > > You misunderstood the idea/goal behind the multilinestring proposal. It > wasn't > created to factorize tags of all members. It was used to record one real life > feature made of 2 or more OSM way objects. (like a long river, a boundary > between two countries all made of hundreds of ways) > > A key sentence has been added to avoid using it badly : > > "Do not use it to group loose ways : Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories > (like all path in a forest) Example : if the name is not the same for all > those ways, then you'd better not use this relation" > > What you are looking for is a category thing to group "loose ways" sharing a > common property but relation weren't made for that > :http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
