On 09.01.2014 15:07, Martin Vonwald wrote: > Hi! > > 2014/1/9 fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com > <mailto:lowfligh...@googlemail.com>> > > .... and only use gambling, especially as > it might collide with another value of amenity. > > > In my opinion we all really should start accepting that a key might have > more than one possible value. I don't see any problem in > amenity=pub;gambling .
I would decide between the major key and subkeys. amenity=restaurant/bar/pub/nightclub might be a special case due to history but can be solved in different was. > ----- > Ok, you don't like the semi-colon, so lets move gambling to a different > key - now we have amenity=pub + gambling=yes -> problem solved. Fine. > Oh, wait - there's a pub that's also a nightclub! amenity=pub;nightclub? > No way, so lets move nightclub to a different key - problem solved! > Again. One moment: this pub sells ice_cream! No problem, just move > ice_cream to a different key.... > ----- > > See what I mean? Yes > The sooner we start to accept multiple values the less problems we will > have in the future. <--- my opinion! +1 I do not like all the tahes with yes/no as values either. Have a look at the recycling wiki page for an example. fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging