2014/1/4 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > 2014/1/3 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> > >> I am for a combination of surface and surface tags. >> > +1 >
Hehe > The descriptions on the smoothness page, i.e. "thin_rollers", > "thin_wheels", "wheels", "robust_wheels", "high_clearance", > "off_road_wheels", "specialized_off_road_wheels", "No wheeled vehicle" are > easier to understand and more suitable to get consistent tagging than > values like "bad", "very_bad", "horrible", "very_horrible". > > In general you should have (when tagging = in the editor (presets)) the > whole scale from good to bad in front of you in order to judge well which > value to assign. > I agree those values should be changed. I like the wheel approach. Maybe we could even have several sets of values. One of those sets could be the depth of the average hole in millimeters. Other sets could be characteristic for the surface or of the preferred mode of transport. Maybe other cultures have other ways of evaluating smoothness. Janko
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
