Hi Fernando. I'm not exactly sure what you want to show with your table, but if you want to add a new tag to integrate all existent systems (surface, tracktype and so on), and if you table should be a way to calculate that fourth tag, then why should we add the tag itself? Who really needs a single value tag "quality" if it's value can be calculated from other tags by a simple function?
If not, what should the new tag do what the old one(s) cannot express? A simple numeric tag tend to increase confusion on when to use which value, as it's sometimes the case with some of the old tags already. regards Peter Am 03.01.2014 18:19, schrieb Fernando Trebien: > I decided to extend my comparison between tracktype and surface, now > including smoothness. I think we may need a new tag to integrate all > surface quality classification systems (it can well be a simple > numeric tag). See this: http://i.imgur.com/yEJ52eE.png > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:49 PM, malenki <o...@malenki.ch> wrote: >> Am Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:36:13 +0100 >> schrieb Peter Wendorff <wendo...@uni-paderborn.de>: >> >>> I know (without being able to show you photos or something like that) >>> ways that are paved with paving stones (and thus clearly counted as >>> paved), but due to tree roots below the way and so on are >>> tracktype=grade3 or worse >> >> This is the point where we have a look at smoothness=* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
