It should not be changed, garden is garden - private or not. Filtering out access=private to show only public ones is trivial. I see also no arguments for changing meaning of tag used over 150k times.
---- On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 01:37:06 -0800 cracklinrain <cra_klinr...@gmx.de> wrote ---- Hi, the wiki page of leisure=garden says that every ordinary garden, which is not accessible by the public (not even once), can be tagged as leisure=garden. You just have to tag it to access=private. I actually do not think that this is helpful for anybody. On the other hand: Isn't it already included in landuse=residential? So will we really need this tag leisure=garden? I would propose the usage of leisure=garden for public accessible (which might include some private gardens) with a focus on more special plants. Maybe as a subpart of a park. Otherwise it should be deprecated in my opinion. What do you think? Cheers cracklinrain _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
