Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> writes: > 2013/11/17> The definition given for the landuse-polygon seems too > restrictive, I'd > ditch the second part "are constructed up to a boundary or barrier > separating this land from private property." > (Because there doesn't have to be private property along a road, and > neither there will always be boundaries or barriers).
In Massachusetts, there is essentially always a lot boundary adjacent to a "highway" (which means a legal road). Sometimes those lots are owned by the government. But there's a very clear notion of "being within the the land allocated to the roadway" which is much wider than the pavement. So I think landuse=highway does make sense and should be about some blend of land ownership, lot lines, etc. I don't mean to say that should be mandatory, but it's how it should be when it makes sense contextually.
pgpGlhb1TISmq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
