Ok. So I will move to line=junction_box et line=marker (like pipeline=valve and pipeline=marker).
Thank you. *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com 2013/10/16 Ole Nielsen <on-...@xs4all.nl> > On 16/10/2013 20:57, François Lacombe wrote: > >> I was wondering if using line=* for busbars and bay is the best thing to >> do regarding of what line=* is commonly used for : >> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.**org/keys/?key=line<http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=line> >> >> There are busbar and bay obviously but many other values dealing with >> public transport. >> >> Thus, and I'm sorry to suggest that just 2 weeks after the end of the >> vote, power:line=* wouldn't be better for busbar and bay ? >> I'm planning to use this for some stuff in power transmission refinement. >> > > I can't see any problems. line=* is indeed used a lot on public transport > features (mostly nodes (bus stops?) and relations). But there shouldn't be > any chance of confusion since the two contexts are so different. In both > situations (power and public transport) 'line' is used only as an > additional tag. It would indeed have been a problem if 'line' was a main > tag used for identifying the type of feature. But that is not the case > here. 'power=*' is never used on public transport features and vice versa. > > Further line=busbar/bay follows the established practice of using the main > tag value as a key in an additional tag (power=line, line=busbar). No need > to make things more complex if there are no real conflicts. > > > Ole > > ______________________________**_________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/tagging<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
