2013/10/16 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > >> Am 16/ott/2013 um 09:23 schrieb Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com>: >> >> This feature of JOSM indicates to me that there is most likely widespread >> use of bicycle=no on crossings with the meaning of bicycle=dismount. > > there is really no difference in meaning between bicycle=no (cycling is > legally forbidden) and bicycle=dismount (you may not cycle here legally)
Martin, your statement here is the same as the one which fly used to start this thread, and a few of us in the UK have pointed out that there is indeed a difference between two situations, both of which occur often: * cycling AND pushing a cycle are forbidden (which, UK-based, I consider bicycle=no) * cycling BUT NOT pushing a cycle is forbidden (which, UK-based, I consider bicycle=dismount) The problem is that different groups of people have interpreted bicycle=no differently. That's the problem that this thread should address, if it achieves anything. But it is not helpful when you assert "there is really no difference in meaning". Best Dan _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
