I'm sorry but maybe some misspellings changed the message. So let me clarify.
Renderers often don't support life cycle tags, but that doesn't matter because we don't tag for the renderer/applications, right? If you just add a disused tag, the route likely will still be rendered in current map styles made for hikers. That may or may not be a good thing. I think it's good if the route is still open to the public, otherwise no. Didn't mean to say hiking routes should not be rendered, sorry for the confusion. I think they should. On Oct 2, 2013 7:36 AM, "SomeoneElse" <[email protected]> wrote: > Fernando Trebien wrote: > >> >> Wouldn't the more generic disused=yes apply to this case? Rendering apps >> should support lifecycle tags and render them accordingly (though often >> then don't ... >> >> I think that you've answered your own question already :) > > ... and none would support this anyway). >> >> > If you mean "don't render hiking routes" than that's obviously wrong; if > you mean "don't render _disused_ hiking routes then that's probably a > feature, but any that do render hiking routes that don't also look for > disused=yes (or whatever) will miss it. > > Cheers, > > Andy > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/tagging<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
