This proposal sounds unclear to me : It says the tag to use is currently under discussion, so what are we voting for ?
Not to mention the abbreviation problem... *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com 2013/9/30 Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> > On 30 September 2013 18:22, fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Major problem I find is that using a abbreviation is not the way we tag >> in OSM and it is often misleading. >> > > We do use abbreviations for keys/values: for example mtb, bmx, hgv, psv, > url, rcn. > > In this particular case, I think more people have familiarity with the > abbreviation than with the full term, so I see here nothing wrong with > sticking to the abbreviation. Or are you proposing to start using > uniform_resource_locator as well? > > -- Matthijs > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
