On 2013-09-24 20:07, bredy wrote : > Why there'are two method for tagging waterfall? > I see waterway=waterfall and natural=waterfall. > > The first had a page osm very poor and the second is proposed feature, but > abbandoned. > > Can we take a solution? We have already discussed those inconsistencies with highway=crossing which is certainly not a highway but rather a footway, and which prevents the crossing to be tagged on a way called highway=* (not a node) to indicate it's painted longitudinally on it, => crossing=yes or something to be discussed like =pedestrian or =railway historical=castle which certainly does not apply to a château => castle=* + possibly historical=yes/no/YYYY maybe castle=château natural=water + water=tank which is simply contradictory => water=tank alone seems OK to me etc etc etc The keys should be defined as either object or attributes. There may be discussions as to which is which but we should agree and stop the OSM reputation that tagging is made according to everybody's mood. So, in this case, I see no reason why it should not be waterfall=* which is evident while the *= you present are obviously not.
Cheers, André.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
