Just some more aspects
Matthijs Melissen wrote > There is no consensus on what to do if votings and actual use disagree. There is also no consensus on what constitutes a valid vote. Some times there are questionable "votes", discussing things for a short time in remote places, avoiding discussaion and calling it a vote. On the other hand, other people reject votes where erverything has been done right according to the proposal scheme. There's some fundamental mechanics that neither a vote nor just-doing-it can change - changing an existing tagging scheme will always invalidate all prior work. Never a good idea. - some tagging schemes are not technically feasible, e.g. main tags with lists of multiple values bye, Nop -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/How-to-overcome-lack-of-consensus-tp5777756p5778060.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
