Il giorno 28/ago/2013, alle ore 20:34, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> ha
scritto:
> We have lots of geometry that follows roads: sidewalks, bike lanes,
> cycleways, contraflow cycleways, kerbs. Why not power?
I can follow your argument ("who's gonna do all that dumb work of tracing power
lines in large rural areas like in the US"), but it is preferable to have a
distinct object for what is really something different in the real world.
Otherwise you either get long, ugly and error prone tags and tag lists on the
object or you risk of not knowing any more to which implicit object a tag
refers to (e.g. name, ref, operator, Wikipedia etc). That's why I suggest to
preferably create dedicated geometry and preliminary (the quick way) reuse the
road geometry with relations (e.g. route=power_transmission) to get a proper
object instead of adding the power tags on the road object.
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
