Maarten, I know there is some controversy ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Path_controversy) over the tagging of paths, so perhaps adding those tags would be for clarification, in case the user interprets the footway in some other way.
Elliott On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Is there a deeper meaning of adding foot=yes or bicycle=yes to > highway=track or highway=path without adding other limitations? I thought > track and path are by default routable for foot and bicycle, so IMHO they > add nothing. > > Examples: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/way/53561813<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53561813> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/way/68796031<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/68796031> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/way/195440134<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/195440134> > > Regards, > Maarten > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/tagging<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> > -- Elliott Plack http://about.me/elliottp
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
