On 16.06.2013 22:50, Rob Nickerson wrote: >>@Rob: >>Did you ever try to describe the junction with the Lane and Road >>Attributes? > > No, I didn't. And as I've been busy with organising SOTM I didn't even > fully read the tag proposal (hence I didn't vote). I hope you agree that > my general comment about reading through and attempting to address the > critical points on the through_route proposal is the right way forward. > Yes, this may mean dropping the tag proposal altogether and working with > a different tag instead. > > In my opinion, what the through_route tag was aiming to do is still a > good idea. I see it as more important for small unclassified country > roads, rather than multi-lane highways. Here in the UK many small > historic rural roads can have tight bends and often, if there is a > connecting road, a satnav will give an instruction to turn right/left > when one is not in fact needed (or not give an instruction when one is > needed).
Now, I get your problem. We are talking about unclassified roads (no ref) right ? Stiil the Lane and Road Attributes should work as you can tag the "through_route" and the turning_lanes which might be also the single lane leading straight and allowing a turn. As you tag the direction on the turns (left/right) the router could get infos about the turns. fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
