Why don't use our old "relation = tarffic_lights"? (or junction?) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Traffic_Lights (yes, it need more advanced!)
I would like to against write them as area. Relation feature essentially means, "group up some objects to represent as a feature". So I think it could suite for our traffic_signal & junction naming, routing. (relation could express "label" membership) 2013/3/29 Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I saw this proposal before and I liked it. Now I like it even more > because > > it solves the junction name problem. > > As area, only used 3 times by 2 different users in one year (date of > the proposal): > > 2 by the proposal writer "imagic": > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/210448306 > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/202280167 > > 1 by "Soldier Boy": > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/190569949 > > Another one is a mistake (roundabout): > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43114115 > > Not something I would call "a success". > > But 1132 relations of type "junction": > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/type=junction > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/relations/junction#overview > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Junctions > > Pieren > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
