indeed, European routes sometimes don't exist too, because only cities and towns are written on base agreement; sometimes, European route contain a section, where ferry is expected, but it doesn't exist, or contain a section, where road is expected, but it doesn't exist; European routes are mostly directions than concrete roads; but of course, it depends on country; as I know, there is no traffic signs with e-roads in UK as well;
when there are three roads between points A and B, and we mark one of them as primary, second as secondary and third as a tertiary, it is also looks like working as routing application; if there is evident movement of cars between two e-roads through some road, it as a fact, which can be marked, I think. ----------- 2013/3/14 Pieren <pier...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Dinamik <dinamik...@gmail.com> wrote: >> example, European routes (see WikiProject Europe/E-road network). The >> network has some gaps, which are caused by formal reasons. > > Problem with that proposal is that you tag something which does not > exist. I have the feeling that you just act as a routing application > (find best way from A to B). > > Pieren > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
