I would disagree that place=neighbourhood implies landuse=residential: I know of neighborhoods that are mostly industrial or commercial landuse. Brad
On Friday, February 15, 2013, wrote: > This is a posting on the wiki which I've responded to --> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:landuse#Landuse.3D_-vs-_Place.3D > > The text of my input, for discussion: > > My opinion on this is that _place=neighborhood_ implies > _landuse=residential_ but not vice versa. In that case, if one has > information on a particular area having a name and a boundary which allows > one to refer to it as a named place, then neighborhood would be preferred. > For instance, a relation of _type=boundary_ and _border_type=subdivision_ I > created at http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2674522 ; > _place=neighborhood_ is on the label node, but it might just as well (maybe > better) been put on the relation so that rendering like that via WIWOSM > would show a boundary instead of a node. I'm glad to hear people's > opposition to or support for this opinion. --Ceyockey (talk) 12:23, 15 > February 2013 (UTC) > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org <javascript:;> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
