On Monday, January 28, 2013, Werner Hoch wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag, den 28.01.2013, 17:26 +0100 schrieb Tobias Knerr: > > Nevertheless, there appears to be a trend to merge them into a single > > area for the entire river via multipolygons. This has been brought to my > > attention by a recent changeset > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14808765 > > which added previously separate sections of the Danube river into this > > multipolygon: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1189126 > > This wasn't a multipolygon before. It was a collection of riverbank > elements. > Nobody likes them but nobody is bold enough to delete them. > > Tagged back to: > type=waterway > waterway=riverbank > and added a note= > > There are a few of that monster relations out there: > > http://www.h-renrew.de/h/osm/osmchecks/02_Relationstypen/planet/bd8a1061c196c9de.html > > Some are tagged with type=collection. That's not better or worse, just > different. >
What's wrong with http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
