I didn't invent neither building:use nor building:type. I was also curious about building:type. I've seen these keys somewhere - cant remember where - and thought they were accepted. Obviously I was wrong.
Regards, Martin Am 23.01.2013 um 16:59 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > 2013/1/23 Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>: >> I just want to add my understanding of the building tags: >> building=xxx (with no other tags like building:use): it looks like a >> xxx and is used as xxx >> building:use=xxx: it is used as xxx, but might not look like one >> building:type=xxx: it looks like xxx, but might not be used as xxx > > > I'm not sure I get this. If we say that the value for key "building" > is a building type, then the key "building:type" would be the same, > no? The key "building:use" on the other hand is usually given by other > keys (landuse, shop, amenity, office, craft, tourism, aeroway, > railway, ...) > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
