On 15 December 2012 11:19, Erik Johansson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Markus Lindholm >> You mean that the role description could be left empty because it >> could always be deduced from tags on the member? I guess it could be >> possible, but I think it is much much better to have an explicit role >> descriptions, foremost for the benefit of the next mapper who comes >> along and wants to improve and edit the relation. So that he can >> clearly see what the intention is with the different members. > > > The redundancy is what got me wondering what else the role could be > used for, but I guess there are two parts of that. One is that it > doesn't really need to be more complex and that it's probably fine if > I leave the role part out. > > Should I use it on railways stations with subway_entrance and parkings?
Yes, I think it might very well be used to connect a railway=subway_entrance to a railway=station. Parking an excellent suggestion for a new role to the relation, I'll add it to the page. /Markus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
