As the massive objection-storm has settled down a little I'll document that tag. ;-) Thanks to Martin and Alberto for their feedback.
Martin 2012/10/17 Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>: > 2012/10/17 Alberto <albertoferra...@fastwebnet.it>: >>>You're right. I'll change the proposal in the following way: >>>a) building=stable, no building:use: looks like a stable, used as a stable >>>b) building=stable, building:use=<not stable>: looks like a stable, >>>but used for something different >>>c) building=<whatever>, building:use=stable: looks like <whatever>, >>>but is used as stable >>>I assume, that the majority of who used building=stable in the past >>>meant "it is used as a stable". >>>Better? >>>Martin >> >> +1. Since this tag is already used, I think that you should also create a >> page in active map features, not only in proposed features. >> cheers >> Alberto > > That's exactly what I want to do, but only after I'm sure that no one > objects (too much). > > Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
