2012/10/15 Colin Smale <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl>: > I am not sure I would interpret the diagram in that way though; the fact > that there are no arrows on the road from part 5 onwards suggests to me that > there is no chance of changing your mind.
There is no chance of (legally) changing your mind, because there are double solid lines ;-) > I think the intention is that part > 5 is the start of physical separation, but I might be wrong here. Sorry, you are wrong - I drew the image ;-) But because the image is not 100% clear I added a note in the related article and now I have to make sure the note is correct and clear. Thanks! Martin > Colin > > > On 15/10/2012 10:56, Martin Vonwald wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> Some kind of short how-would-you-tag-this-survey. Have a look at part >> five of this motorway: >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Lanes_Example_2.png >> >> Only part 5 is relevant. Assume there is no physical separation just a >> double line between the upper and lower two lanes. How would you tag >> this: >> a) One way with lanes=4 >> b) Two separate ways with lanes=2 each >> c) Tell me! >> >> Please also reason your decision. >> >> Many thanks in advance, >> Martin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
