2012/9/13 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com>:
> I think all those designated/official/yes are the same thing. They allow
> something to go through a certain way. What is different is the source of
> that allowance. If the source is law (access=yes, access:source=de:law) then
> it's official. If you have a "access:source=sign", then it's designated. If
> you don't have a source, then it's just "yes, you can pass here, don't ask
> me how I know".


I am not sure if introducing even more tagging variants really helps
us to make this issue easier.

If you want to tag some source I'd prefer to use the scheme
source:access=value, but "law" doesn't anyway make much sense to me
(there is always some law applicable, regardless of the
access-situation, e.g. also signs are defined by law.) and "de:law"
even less. Shouldn't that be "de:Gesetz"? Or "law:DE"? Then do we need
the country in the tag? Will there be cases where German law would be
applied outside Germany? How would you abbreviate a local "law" (e.g.
from the municipality)? Otherwise a simple "law" would be sufficient
to tag the applicable law for this kind of object (could also be
international treaties, local law, ...).

In the end it seems easier to stick a restricted set of a few well
defined (and already used) values instead of introducing new
confusion.

cheers,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to