I see your point concerning you don't have to do it that way. But I don't really se any reason for not doing it that way? And if it makes it simpler?
But I have no big objection for what you say. I myself have mapped a lot of houses the way you stated before I saw some other presentation Lulu-Ann made and thought "hadn't thought of that". And isn't all taggig done according to diffrent peoples opinions? :) (just a thought). Best Regards Thod 2012/5/18 Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de>: > Tobias Johansson wrote: >> >> And preferbly the nodes with addresses should correspond to an >> entrence of the building. Some reasons for this, I add a .pdf with >> some: >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Housenumbers.pdf > > > May I ask you to avoid quoting that PDF? It only presents Lulu-Ann's > personal opinion, and the argument is flawed because it completely ignores > that software can guide you to an entrance node in a building outline even > if the address is on the outline, rather than the entrance. > > My preferred way to place addresses is: > - put them on building outlines if there is one number per building > - put them on entrances if there are separate numbers for each entrance > > Tobias > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
