On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de> wrote: > 01.05.2012 11:53, Pieren wrote:
> How about that one? > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/48923955 If I understand correctly this document (http://regiowiki.pnp.de/index.php/Zentraler_Omnibusbahnhof_Passau), it is serving 5 stations. So the "name" is incorrect and the way should be split for the 5 "Bussteig". I would expect that the single way is for a single platform. > It's a public_transport=platform for busses. There's a building with > ticket shops and toilets in the centre (not mapped yet). Holes can be modelled as usual like we model holes in parks or buildings. > But that's not what we decided to do in those cases. Instead, we > invented area=yes. We invented area=yes for the ambiguous closed way tagged with "highway=*". Spreading its usage on more features generates side effects like seeing more and more often the "area=yes" incorrectly attached on landuses, buildings, leisures, etc or even just as primary tag combined with "name" on closed ways (enough for rendering correctly the name in Mapnik). It is strange to see how easy it is accepted to split ways for silly route or boundary relations and rejected here. Pieren _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
