Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 4/10/2012 6:38 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: >> Not explicitly. And while it is true that the examples don't include >> sidewalks, they do include cycleways, where we have basically the same >> debate whether or not they should be separate ways. > > Are you talking about bike lanes or sidepaths?
I am talking about bicycle lanes that are not physically separate from the car lanes. These should be mapped as cycleway=lane (or variants thereof, such as cycleway:left/right=lane), but some micromappers seem to like mapping them as individual ways for some reason. While cycleway=lane is fine as a start, I would suggest that these should also be added to the *:lanes list _if_ you use a proposal such as the one I linked to earlier. Otherwise, some situations cannot be adequately modelled. Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
