2012/3/11 Johan Jönsson <joha...@goteborg.cc>: > leisure=bandstand is a good tag. > The bandstand is a prominent feature that is easy to map, so ease of mapping > with one tag is prefect. > > With one tag it maps both: > *the physical building (band_stand says in one word that it is a small open > pavilion) > *the use/function: scheduled music (a bit informal)
Is this not bad, having more (independent) information in one tag? Imagine that person A - technocratic deaf engineer who hates music and person B - artist who loves music and does not care a bit whether it is inside or outside or anything about buildings. Both happen to be mappers: on cannot input the interesting construction without adding info about music, the other cannot enter music without construction. Even worse for them if they want to make a map. > > A question, there is no such things as indoor band-stands, right? > > There could be some controversy if one instead want one tag for all small > pavilions, garden-kiosks, gazebos out there. building=pavilion > > If one would want one tag for all music-playing places, leaisure=music_venue > or leisure=music. This sounds much, much better. Lukáš Matějka (LM_1) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
