Am 19. Februar 2012 10:47 schrieb Werner Hoch <werner...@gmx.de>: > Hi all, > > the relation type=waterway proposal was written long times ago but never > formally approved: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Waterway > > The relation is widely used as you can see in statistics: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Waterway#Tools > > It would be cool if you could vote for the proposal: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Waterway#Voting > > > It would help to clean up the OSM database from a few similar relations > that are rarely used but not yet follow the above scheme.
Before we vote, shouldn't we try to clean up the proposal? E.g. there is this sentence: "Hint: If the waterway starts as a stream and becomes larger, then use the tag of the largest waterway (e.g. river)." Well, almost all rivers start small and become bigger ;-), but despite being small, don't they already start as rivers at their spring? cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
