Ok, i agree with most of you!
highway=cycleway + railway=abandoned is good.
Some people prefer highway=cycleway + railway=dismantled (see:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Railways#Abandoned_railways_where_all_evidence_has_been_removed)
So should we change the proposal to these both cases!? (so we can pimp the
wiki (Key:cycleway & Key:railway))
Then we need a consensus about rendering in Mapnik!
Ohh is see, the Osmarender plot both, cycleway & abandoned railway:
http://hikebikemap.de/?zoom=16&lat=47.11665&lon=-118.02014&layers=000B0FFFFF
And on OpenCycleMap, the routes (or ways with "ref"(?)) are highlighted:
http://hikebikemap.de/?zoom=17&lat=51.14368&lon=7.28507&layers=00B00FFFFF
---
Am 30.01.2012, 15:05 Uhr, schrieb Volker Schmidt <[email protected]>:
I like the idea to see ex-railway cycleways on the map. I also like to
see
cycle routes on the map, and I would like to see ex-railways on the map.
I have my doubts whether the tagging of a cycleway as being on a n
ex-railway should be done at the level of a key to the highway tag. If I
understand your proposal correctly a typical tagging would look like this
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
surface= xxx
width= xxx
ref= xxx
rail_trail=yes
I see several problems whit this approach:
If the ex-railway continues, as it often happens on a piece of normal
raod,
not on a designated cycle path, would you add railtrail=yes to
highway=secondary. If you don't do that the rendering will be
interrupted.
Then I do not see how you would instruct the routing algorithm to prefer
the railtrail ways over other cycleways
I only thought about cycleways, so if there is a section
highway=secondary, there it makes no sence to tag it as a "good" railtrail.
For routing it's no problem, because the railtrail is a bit shorter, so
the routing-quality of the hole way (included the secondary) is only a bit
more less.
---
Am 30.01.2012, 14:51 Uhr, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer
<[email protected]>:
(plus any other tags). Ocassionally you might also want to add some of
these:
embankment=yes (de:Damm)
cutting=yes (de:Einschnitt)
tunnel
bridge
right, i can add this to the proposal page.
---
Am 30.01.2012, 14:46 Uhr, schrieb Gleb Smirnoff <[email protected]>:
I'll upload several fotos and link them to proposal page in next few
days, as well as add couple of words to the proposal, if you don't
mind.
feel free, to add some information to the proposal page.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
